Organic waste is produced wherever there is human habitation. The main forms of organic
waste are household food waste, agricultural waste, human and animal waste. In
industrialised countries the amount of organic waste produced is increasing dramatically
each year. Although many gardening enthusiasts ‘compost’ some of their kitchen and garden
waste, much of the household waste goes into landfill sites and is often the most hazardous
waste. The organic waste component of landfill is broken down by micro-organisms to form
a liquid ‘leachate’ which contains bacteria, rotting matter and maybe chemical contaminants
from the landfill. This leachate can present a serious hazard if it reaches a watercourse or
enters the water table. Digesting organic matter in landfills also generates methane, which is
a harmful greenhouse gas, in large quantity. Human organic waste is usually pumped to a
treatment plant where it is treated, and then the effluent enters a watercourse, or it is
deposited directly into the sea. Little effort is made to reclaim the valuable nutrient or energy
content of this waste.

In developing countries, there is a different approach to dealing with organic waste. In fact,
the word ‘waste’ is often an inappropriate term for organic matter, which is often put to good
use. The economies of most developing countries dictates that materials and resources
must be used to their full potential, and this has propagated a culture of reuse, repair and
recycling. In many developing countries there exists a whole sector of recyclers, scavengers
and collectors, whose business is to salvage ‘waste’ material and reclaim it for further use.
Where large quantities of waste are created, usually in the major cities, there are inadequate
facilities for dealing with it, and much of this waste is either left to rot in the streets, or is
collected and dumped on open land near the city limits. There are few environmental
controls in these countries to prevent such practices.

There are a variety of ways of using organic waste and in this technical brief we hope to
outline a few of the principle methods used for putting it to good use. The three main ways
of using organic waste that we will look at are for soil improvement, for animal raising and to
provide a source of energy.
Organic waste – types, sources and uses
As mentioned earlier, there a number of types of organic waste which are commonly
discarded. Below we will look at the types and sources of organic waste and some
examples of common uses for this waste.
Domestic or household waste
This type of waste is usually made up of food scraps, either cooked or uncooked, and
garden waste such as grass cuttings or trimmings from bushes and hedges. Domestic
kitchen waste is often mixed with non-organic materials such as plastic packaging, which
cannot be composted. It is beneficial if this type of waste can be separated at source – this
makes recycling of both types of waste far easier. Domestic or household waste is usually
produced in relatively small quantities. In developing countries, there is a much higher
organic content in domestic waste. From Figure 1 we can see that up to 60% (or more in
some cases) of all municipal waste is organic matter, much higher than the figure for an
industrialised country. It is therefore well worth intercepting this supply of useful material
where it can be used effectively.
Recycling of organic waste Practical Action
Figure 1: Composition of municipal waste in a typical developing and industrialised country
(actual figures vary significantly – this figure is only an example).
Commercially produced organic waste.
By this, we mean waste generated at institutional buildings, such as schools, hotels and
restaurants. The quantities of waste here are much higher and the potential for use in
conjunction with small-scale enterprise is good (see box 2).
Animal and human waste.

It is worth mentioning at the start of this section that there are serious health risks involved

with handling sewage. Raw sewage contains bacteria and pathogens that cause serious

illness and disease. It should be stressed that health and safety procedures should be

followed when dealing with sewage and that people involved with its handling should have a

clear understanding of the health risks involved. Raw sewage should never be applied to

crops which are for consumption by humans or animals.

• Human faecal residue is produced in large quantities in urban areas and is dealt with

in a variety of ways. In the worst cases, little is done to remove or treat the waste

and it can present enormous health risks. This is often the case in the slum districts

or poor areas of some large cities. Sewage is often dealt with crudely and is

pumped into the nearest water body with little or no treatment. There are methods

for large-scale treatment and use of sewage as a fertiliser and a source of energy.

The most commonly used method is anaerobic digestion to produce biogas and

liquid fertiliser. Composting toilets (see later section) facilitate the conversion of

human faecal waste into rich compost.

• Animal residue is rarely wasted. This fertile residue is commonly used as a source

of fertiliser, being applied directly to the land, or as a source of energy, either

through direct combustion (after drying) or through digestion to produce methane


Agricultural residue

This is the ‘waste’ which remains after the processing of crops (e.g. maize stalks, rice husks,

foliage, etc.). There are a wide variety of applications for this residue, ranging from simple

combustion on an open fire to complex energy production processes that use this waste as a

fuel stock. It is not within the scope of this paper to deal with the many and varied uses of

agricultural residues.

Methods of processing organic waste

As mentioned in the introduction, there are three main ways in which organic waste can be


¨ soil improvement

¨ animal raising and

¨ to provide a source of energy

Differing levels of processing are required for achieving the above and in this section we will

take a brief look at just some of the common approaches to using organic waste. Figure 2

below, shows some of the options in the form of a flow diagram.


Composting is simply the method of breaking down organic materials in a large container or

heap. The decomposition occurs because of the action of naturally occurring microorganisms

such as bacteria and fungi. Small invertebrates, such as earthworms and

millipedes, help to complete the process. Composting can convert organic waste into rich,

dark coloured compost, or humus, in a matter of a few weeks or months. There is nothing

mysterious or complicated about composting. Natural composting, or decomposition, occurs

all the time in the natural world. Organic material, the remains of dead animals and plants, is

broken down and consumed by micro-organisms and eaten by small invertebrates. Under

controlled conditions, however, the process can be speeded up.

Composting has many benefits;

• It provides a useful way of reclaiming nutrients from organic refuse

• Saves valuable landfill space and possible contamination of land and water due to

landfill ‘leachate’

• Can be used as fertiliser on farmland or in the garden

• Improves the condition of soils

In composting, provided the right conditions are present, the natural process of decay is

speeded up. This involves controlling the composting environment and obtaining the

following conditions:

Urban organic/

vegetable waste

Human and

animal waste

Composting Briquetting Anaerobic digestion Compost



Compost Animal


Fuel Compost Fuel Fertiliser Compost

• The correct ratio of carbon to nitrogen. The correct ratio is in the range of 25 to 30

parts carbon to 1 part nitrogen (25:1 to 30:1). This is because the bacteria which

carry out the composting process digest carbon twenty five to thirty times faster than

they digest nitrogen. This is often seen as being a roughly equal amounts of

“greens” and “browns”. Carbon to nitrogen ratio will be referred to hereafter as the

C:N ratio. The C:N ratio can be adjusted by mixing together organic materials with

suitable contents.

• The correct amount of water. Plants have a liquid rather than a solid diet and

therefore the compost pile should be kept moist at all times. On the other hand, a

wet compost pile will produce only a soggy, smelly mess.

• Sufficient oxygen. A compost pile should be turned often to allow all parts of the pile

to receive oxygen.

• The optimum pH level of the compost is between 5.5 and 8.

In these conditions, bacteria and fungi feed and multiply, giving off a great deal of heat. In

well managed heaps, this temperature can reach as high as 60 C, which is sufficient to kill

weed seeds and organisms that cause disease in plants and animals. While the temperature

remains high, invertebrates are not present in compost heaps, but when the temperature

drops, the invertebrates enter the heap from the surrounding soil and complete the process

of decomposition.

Forms of decomposition

Anaerobic. In anaerobic decomposition, the breakdown of the organic material is

caused by bacteria and fungi that thrive in low or no-oxygen conditions. It is the type

of decomposition that takes place in closed containers. This type of system is more

complex and difficult to control and requires complex equipment for larger scale

composting (see Box 4).

Aerobic. In aerobic decomposition, bacteria and fungi which thrive in high oxygen

conditions are responsible for the decomposition. This form of decomposition

occurs in open heaps and containers that allow air to enter. With open heaps and

more ventilated containers, compost can be formed in a matter of a few months, and

even faster if the organic material is turned regularly. In heaps or bins where

aerobic decomposition is occurring, there should be no unpleasant odours.

Some methods of composting

Composting systems can be opened or closed, that is the organic matter will either be

placed in open piles or rows or in a closed container or reactor. The open system is rarely

used in low-income countries due to its technical complexity, so we look at some of the open

systems in use.

Backyard composting at the household level is a simple technique. It requires only

suitable organic waste, space to construct the heap and time to carry out the

necessary work. The waste can be placed in a pit (say 2m x 2m x 1m deep) and left

to decompose for 2 – 3 months. Alternatively, the waste can be piled up within an

enclosure of 4 poles and surrounded by boards or chicken wire and left for a similar

period. This produces a rich compost which can be used as a fertiliser on fields or


Neighbourhood composting. A commonly used technique for neighbourhood

composting is the use of windrows. Here waste is simply laid out in long rows and

turned occasionally. Another method is the rotating bin method which uses a series

of closed, aerated bins (see Lardinois3).

Co-composting is technique whereby organic food waste is mixed with human or

animal excreta and composted Similar techniques are used to those described

above. See Box 3 for an example of co-composting. There are many examples of

successful co-composting systems throughout the world (see Lardinois3).

Large-scale, centralised composting has tended to be unsuccessful in developing

countries for a number of technical and organisational reasons. It is not dealt with in

this paper.

Medium scale biogas and compost production from market garbage in

Colombo, Sri Lanka

A pilot project being implemented by the Colombo Municipal Council uses organic waste

from local city vegetable markets to produce biogas and compost. The digesters were

developed by the National Energy Research and Development Centre and accept dry

batches of organic waste. There are four 20 foot diameter floating dome digesters (see

figure 3) each with a capacity of 40 tonnes dry waste. The residence time for the organic

matter is 4 months and thus the four tanks are able to deal with a total of 480 tonnes of

market waste each year.

The waste produces approximately 1 cubic metre of biogas per tonne per day and this

translates to a total of 7500 kilowatt hours of electricity each year. The system also yields

300 tonnes of saleable fertiliser each year. Before this, all the waste had to be landfilled

outside the city.

The digester is made from concrete with a floating fibreglass cover. The gas is piped from

the digester and is used to power a 220 volt, 5 kilowatt converted engine. There is also a

baker’s oven and a catering size gas burner at the site to demonstrate the uses of the gas.

Now we will look at an example of animal rearing using organic food scraps. This is a typical

example of waste being put to good use and benefiting a number of groups.

Pig-feeding in Metro Manila

In the outlying urban areas of Manila, backyard pig- rearing has long been a traditional

source of income. Commercially produced feed for this activity is expensive and pig raisers

often turn to organic scraps to supplement or replace the commercial product. A network of

collectors has developed that collects organic waste from restaurants in the city centre, and

then distribute it amongst the backyard farmers. The farmers can purchase the scrap at

about half the price of the commercial feed. A cost comparison carried out under the

WAREN project (cited in a report titled ‘Recycling activities in Metro Manila’) shows that profit

is more than doubled by feeding the pigs on organic scraps, even after all other costs, such

as veterinary costs, transport, fuel, etc., are taken into consideration.

Such ventures are beneficial not only to the pig raisers, but also to the municipality who

would otherwise have to dispose of the waste in a landfill.

Biogas production

Biogas is produced by means of a process known as anaerobic digestion. It is a process

whereby organic matter is broken down by microbiological activity and takes place in the

absence of air (anaerobic means ‘in the absence of air’). It is a phenomenon that occurs

naturally at the bottom of ponds and marshes and gives rise to ‘marsh gas’ or methane,

which is a combustible gas. It also takes place naturally in landfill sites and contributes to

harmful greenhouse gases. Biogas can be produced by digesting human, animal or

vegetable waste in specially designed digesters (see Box 2). Animal waste is particularly

suitable for biogas production because it is often available is large quantities and also has a

suitable C:N ratio. The scale of simple biogas plants can vary from a small ‘household’

system to large commercial plants of several thousand cubic metres. The process is

sensitive to both temperature and feedstock (the correct C:N ratio is required as with

composting) and both need to be controlled carefully for digestion to take place. Digestion

time varies from a couple of weeks to a couple of months.

The digestion of waste yields several benefits:

• the production of methane for use as a fuel.

• the waste is reduced to slurry which has a high nutrient content which makes an

ideal fertiliser; in some cases this fertiliser is the main product from the digester and

the biogas is merely a by-product.

• during the digestion process pathogens in the manure are killed, which is a great

benefit to environmental health.

Figure 3: a typical floating cover biogas digester

Two popular simple designs of digester have been developed for use in developing

countries; the Indian ‘floating cover’ biogas digester (see figure 3 above) and the Chinese

fixed dome digester. Both operate in the same way but the storage chambers have a slightly

different design.

The residual slurry is removed at the outlet and can be used as a fertiliser. Biogas can be

used for a number of applications, including lighting, cooking, electricity generation and as a

replacement for diesel in diesel engines. Some countries have initiated large-scale biogas

programmes, Tanzania being an example. The Tanzanian model is based on integrated

resource recovery from municipal and industrial waste for grid-based electricity and fertiliser

production (Karekezi 1997).

Waste Material C:N Ratio Gas yield (litres per


Human excreta 6 – 10 –

Cow dung (up to 12kg per cow per day) 18 90 – 300

Pig manure (up to 2.5kg per pig per day) – 370 – 500

Chicken manure 7 300

Grass (hay) 12 Not suitable alone

Grass with chicken manure – 350

Paper – Not suitable alone

Paper with chicken manure – 400 – 500

Sewage sludge – 600

Wheat straw 150 Not suitable alone

Bagasse (sugar cane waste) 150 Not suitable alone

Sawdust 200 – 500 Not suitable alone

A gas-cooking burner needs 300 – 600 litres of gas per hour.

A peasant family uses 4000 – 5000 litres per month per person.

The ideal C:N ratio is between 25:1 and 30:1.

Table 1: Ability of waste to produce methane (Source: Vogler, Work from Waste)

Composting toilet

There are a number of methods commonly used for home composting (or small-scale

community composting) of human excreta. The simplest and most elegant solution is the

composting toilet. Usually the design of such a toilet incorporates two chambers, each

capable of holding at least one years deposit of excreta for the proposed site. No water is

added to the chamber, but sawdust or ash can be added to improve the Carbon:Nitrogen

ratio. When the first chamber is full it is sealed off and allowed to aerobically compost. The

process produces a rich, pathogen-free compost. When the second chamber is full, the first

chamber is emptied and the cycle begins again. For a single dwelling, the structure need be

no bigger than that of a typical pit latrine. Other methods of home composting of excreta

include co-composting with vegetable matter or anaerobic digestion in a biogas reactor (see

later) or in a septic tank, which yield a rich slurry compost. For more information on these

techniques see Franceys3.

Health, environment, and social aspects of waste reclamation

Waste collection and disposal is often seen as being the responsibility of the government or

municipality. In many cases the municipality is unable to fulfil this role either due to financial

constraints, lack of will or lack of organisational skills. In many cities, collection and

separation of waste by the private or informal sector is seen as being too time consuming

because of the content of the waste, often a mixture of organic and non-organic substances,

such as plastic film. For there to emerge a successful organic waste reclamation process, it

has been noted that it is of great help if the organic and non-organic waste is separated at

source. It is here that the responsibility is thrown back onto the generator of the waste, the

public. Many successful schemes are only successful because of community participation in

the activities on a day-to-day basis. Where waste is separated at source, this lessens the

risk of contamination from such items as batteries, means that the organic waste is cleaner

(and will therefore fetch a higher price), it is easier to sort and the incidence of injury and

disease related to sorting is decreased. There are a number of good examples of

community recycling or resource recovery schemes in developing countries. Two such

schemes are outlined below.

Accra, Ghana

In the Ghanaian capital, Accra, small-scale composting of domestic waste has been

introduced to help ease the waste situation. The project has been running since 1985 with 3

collection points in low-income districts. As soon as it arrives at the collection points

(delivered by workers from the city’s waste management department) the waste is pre-sorted

– immediately reusable material is separated from organic waste. More solid waste is

removed after the compost has been turned over for the first time. The waste is sorted a

further two times during the composting process and finally sieved before being sold by the

container-load to local farmers. (GATE Questions and Answers No3/89).

Mérida, Mexico

In early 1978 a new drainage and recycling system was commissioned as part of a new lowcost

housing project in Mérida, a city in south-eastern Mexico. The system is known as

SIRDO (Sistema Integrada para la Reciclaje de Derecho Organico – Integrated System for

Organic Waste Recycling). Each house is connected to a drainage system that

distinguishes between grey (washing) and black (toilet) water. The grey water is filtered and

used for irrigation, and the solids in the black water are settled out and used in a cocomposting

process (with household waste) to produce a nutrient rich, dry-powder fertiliser.

The dual chamber system yields compost every 6 months. The treated black water is also

used for irrigation.

The system was designed to be managed by the community. In the early days there was

considerable opposition to the system, not only from the community but also from the local

council and private companies, but this soon dissipated as it became clear that the system

improved the communities sanitation and yielded a good quality saleable compost.

The system is maintained by community members on a voluntary basis and revenue from

the sale of compost (usually to middle class residents for garden use) is reinvested in microenterprises

or used to pay for larger maintenance jobs.

Where the informal sector carries out reclamation activities there is also a direct benefit to

the municipality. A reduction in the quantity of refuse to be collected means a proportional

reduction in the collection costs. Some progressive authorities actually encourage collection

by members of the informal sector and will provide facilities to aid community recycling, as it

is realised that it is cheaper than collection and disposal of waste. The municipality also

often realise the value of contracting the work of collection and disposal to private

companies. In Bogota, a city of 4 million people in Colombia with a waste generation level of

0.5kg per capita per day, it has been estimated that the cost of public waste collection is

approximately US$35 per tonne whereas the private sector can make the collection for

US$17 per tonne, less than half the cost.

There is often a health benefit when the municipality supports the local informal sector in

recycling activities. With proper facilities for collection and processing of waste, many of the

health hazards associated with this work can be removed or reduced.

Where the refuse collection activities are carried out by members of the informal sector, this

is usually characterised by a complex network of interrelated activities. There is usually a

hierarchy of scavengers, collectors, middlemen, dealers, small-scale recycling activities,

micro-enterprise, etc. One of the most institutionalised scavenging systems in the world

exists in Cairo, Egypt. There, a group of former oasis dwellers, called Wahis, have

controlled garbage collection for the last 100 years. Another group, the Zabaleen, pay a fee

to the Wahi for the right to collect garbage. The Zabaleen, with less than one third of the

staff of the municipal sanitation department, collect 1,600 tons of trash each day to the cities

1,450 tons. Even so, 15% of the cities rubbish piles up in the streets. The Zabaleen haul

home the day’s receipts in donkey carts. Later, in residential courtyards, the women and

children of the household sort the trash. Organic materials feed the pigs – their primary

income earners – while glass, paper, plastics, metal and cloth are sold. A report has

suggested that systematic garbage collection by the city would cost more than the entire

municipal budget. Without the Zabaleen, much of the city’s waste would simply not be

collected (Worldwatch Paper 76).

References and further reading

1. McHarry, Jan, Reuse Repair Recycle, Gaia Books Ltd. 1993. A valuable source book

aimed at reducing wastage by thrift. Aimed mainly at a western audience but with many

references applicable to the developing world.

2. Lardinois, I., and Klundert, A van de, Organic Waste – Options for Small-scale Resource

Recovery, Urban Solid Waste Series, TOOL / WASTE Consultants, 1993. The focus of

this book is on the recovery of urban organic waste, in developing countries, through

activities such as animal raising, composting, the production of biogas and briquetting.

3. Franceys, R., A guide to the development of on-site sanitation. WHO 1992. Provides indepth

technical information about the design, construction, operation and maintenance

of on-site sanitation facilities, with numerous practical design examples.

4. Karekezi, S. and Ranja, T., Renewable Energy Technologies in Africa, AFREPEN, 1997.

5. Vogler, Jon, Work from Waste – Recycling Wastes to Create Employment, Intermediate

Technology Publications, 1981. A classic text full of practical ideas for recycling and reuse

of waste.

6. Pollock, Cynthia, Worldwatch paper – Mining Urban Wastes: The Potential for Recycling,

Worldwatch Institute 1987.

7. GATE – questions, answers, information, No 3/89, GTZ 1989

Book: Guttentag, Robert M., Recycling and waste management guide to the internet,

Government Institutes, 4 Research Place Suite 200, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.

Internet addresses Association of Cities for Recycling (ACR). The aim of ACR (an

international non-profit organisation based in Brussels) is to exchange technical and

educational information on the subject of waste management. Home page of the Community Composting Network GTZ Information and Advisory Service on

Appropriate Technology – Biogas Page Web Site for the Swiss Biogas Forum